Dogma-driven reality
It often amazes me the ability of the human mind to create its own reality. A set of beliefs, once established, rarely changes once an individual reaches an "adult" state. Every piece of information (for many) must be forced through the filter of dogma that takes the place of independent thought. Trying to convince such an individual that there may be different interpretation is a frustrating and futile exercise.
The other day I found myself "discussing" tax policy with the Gorn ("why?" you ask. Because I'm a fool). Now generally self-avowed "conservatives" dislike taxes. So I brought up the Earned-Income tax credit. Normally, you'd think that this is something conservatives would like; it's a tax break for a portion of the population. Well, as I learned, you'd be wrong.
See... Apparently tax breaks are a good thing, but only if they benefit the wealthy, whereas the EIC benefits the poorest segment of the population. I "learned" that this policy is bad because (according to the Gorn), "poor people will have more children to cheat on their taxes."
I decided (wisely, I think) to walk away and not engage this further, however I feel the need to deconstruct this concept. This classic form of doublethink can be understood in several ways.
First of all, you must make the assumption that all individuals act within pure self-interest. Secondly you must assume that all individuals are essentially the same in their approach to dealing with their finances.
For example, (according to this worldview) since the wealthy plan ahead with a keen eye on the bottom line, so must everyone else. In other words, because people are fully in command of themselves at all times, they will quickly figure out loopholes to take advantage of "giveaways." (After all, the wealthy do, why shouldn't those on the lower end of the income/wealth scale?)
This is a classic American conservative construction. All actions and consequences are tied directly to the individual. If rich people are rich because they choose to be, then poor people are also poor because they choose to be. This is a lifestyle they have apparently "chosen" with all the foresight and planning that all individuals have. If we return to the Earned Income Tax credit, then following these assumptions, the poor plan years ahead to get a discount on their taxes.
Why, then, since conservatives seem to have no trouble with tax cuts for the wealthy, do they dislike tax cuts for others? Quite simply, this is because they see the poor as a conscious criminal drain on society, and that the wealthy provide something for the rest of the population; wealth creates wealth. When you provide a tax cut to the wealthy, this (theoretically) provides them with more money to create more jobs, because they have so much spare cash lying around. The poor just soak it up like a sponge.
The patent absurdity of this idea (or the idea that the poor don't choose their poverty, much less plan for tax-cuts) is completely lost on dogma-driven apostles of the conservative belief-system (read: religion). Even if one accepts the conservative faith that social welfare programs encourage corruption and cheating amongst the poor, it certainly does not follow that taxes would be an issue to them. More likely than not, those at the poorest end of the population do not think of taxes at all... they live more of a cash-based lifestyle. In reality the EIC is one of the few tax relief programs that really make sense; it provides relief (if only a small amount) to those individuals who really need it the most.
What constitutes the doublethink is a complete lack of empathic ability, or the ability to see things through another's eyes. If the wealthy plan for their taxes, then so does everyone else. If you didn't make enough money to pay as much as they do, then you are resented because you do not contribute into the national coffers (which, of course, the conservatives don't believe in anyway). If you don't figure it out you're stupid... if you do, you're corrupt.
Unless you are wealthy.
The other day I found myself "discussing" tax policy with the Gorn ("why?" you ask. Because I'm a fool). Now generally self-avowed "conservatives" dislike taxes. So I brought up the Earned-Income tax credit. Normally, you'd think that this is something conservatives would like; it's a tax break for a portion of the population. Well, as I learned, you'd be wrong.
See... Apparently tax breaks are a good thing, but only if they benefit the wealthy, whereas the EIC benefits the poorest segment of the population. I "learned" that this policy is bad because (according to the Gorn), "poor people will have more children to cheat on their taxes."
I decided (wisely, I think) to walk away and not engage this further, however I feel the need to deconstruct this concept. This classic form of doublethink can be understood in several ways.
First of all, you must make the assumption that all individuals act within pure self-interest. Secondly you must assume that all individuals are essentially the same in their approach to dealing with their finances.
For example, (according to this worldview) since the wealthy plan ahead with a keen eye on the bottom line, so must everyone else. In other words, because people are fully in command of themselves at all times, they will quickly figure out loopholes to take advantage of "giveaways." (After all, the wealthy do, why shouldn't those on the lower end of the income/wealth scale?)
This is a classic American conservative construction. All actions and consequences are tied directly to the individual. If rich people are rich because they choose to be, then poor people are also poor because they choose to be. This is a lifestyle they have apparently "chosen" with all the foresight and planning that all individuals have. If we return to the Earned Income Tax credit, then following these assumptions, the poor plan years ahead to get a discount on their taxes.
Why, then, since conservatives seem to have no trouble with tax cuts for the wealthy, do they dislike tax cuts for others? Quite simply, this is because they see the poor as a conscious criminal drain on society, and that the wealthy provide something for the rest of the population; wealth creates wealth. When you provide a tax cut to the wealthy, this (theoretically) provides them with more money to create more jobs, because they have so much spare cash lying around. The poor just soak it up like a sponge.
The patent absurdity of this idea (or the idea that the poor don't choose their poverty, much less plan for tax-cuts) is completely lost on dogma-driven apostles of the conservative belief-system (read: religion). Even if one accepts the conservative faith that social welfare programs encourage corruption and cheating amongst the poor, it certainly does not follow that taxes would be an issue to them. More likely than not, those at the poorest end of the population do not think of taxes at all... they live more of a cash-based lifestyle. In reality the EIC is one of the few tax relief programs that really make sense; it provides relief (if only a small amount) to those individuals who really need it the most.
What constitutes the doublethink is a complete lack of empathic ability, or the ability to see things through another's eyes. If the wealthy plan for their taxes, then so does everyone else. If you didn't make enough money to pay as much as they do, then you are resented because you do not contribute into the national coffers (which, of course, the conservatives don't believe in anyway). If you don't figure it out you're stupid... if you do, you're corrupt.
Unless you are wealthy.
5 Comments:
It's funny how bad ideas on the Right never die. And man, do I mean NEVER. The attitude that the poor are a blight on society as opposed to victims of the machinations of the wealthy and powerful go back at least to 1601, and the Elizabethan Poor Law of England.
Now, I know that in today's political America the living dead, those who refuse to moulder in their graves like all decent folk should, include Ronald Reagan, Joe McCarthy, Richard Nixon, Curtis LeMay and others I can't recall at the moment... Not to mention other Red-Scare-era Strangeloves who are not technically deceased such as Don Rummy and Dick "Bang! Whoops, gimme a martini" Cheney.
Why do bad ideas seem to live forever?
I say if we're going to live in 1601 we should really do it, like on those PBS reality shows where they make modern people live on a medieval farm with no amenities and a camcorder in the privy for the inevitable fits of (very modern) whining and weeping.
No medicine! Church rules everything! Let's die of Dropsy! A Republican paradise!
Yes. Well. A damn good post, ex-grad. I don't recommend that you engage with the Gorn again, unless you have Captain Kirk on your side (love the reference!). If you happen to anyway, might you ask him:
show me any living thing, any species, any living community, wherein the weak exploit the strong. Observance of nature and society, plus common sense, tell us that the strong kill and even eat the weak.
As far as taxes go, I am as ignorant as a tabby cat. I just do what Turbotax tells me, then rock, suck my thumb, and hope I don't wet myself with fear of receiving yet another bill I can't pay, inexorably, fatalistically, inevitably, irrevocably, in today's America.
Peace out, and visit me at www.guntotingliberal.blogspot.com
This is a sensible blog, one that deserves to be taken seriously.
nomisam
Fabricate the pitiless with two backs casinos? scrutinize this additional [url=http://www.realcazinoz.com]casino[/url] lodestar and feigning evasively online casino games like slots, blackjack, roulette, baccarat and more at www.realcazinoz.com .
you can also inquire our gossip [url=http://freecasinogames2010.webs.com]casino[/url] handle at http://freecasinogames2010.webs.com and be beneficiary to in palpable folding shin-plasters !
another late-model [url=http://www.ttittancasino.com]casino spiele[/url] consort with is www.ttittancasino.com , because german gamblers, inadvertence in loosen online casino bonus.
Dear Lisa,
For long time I use this freeware: [url=http://www.freeflvtomp3converter.com]FLV to MP3 free converter[/url].
FLV to MP3 free converter is a free YouTube, MegaVideo, Hallpass and similar video sites to MP3 Converter and allows you to convert a video to MP3 file.
This software is fast, free, and requires no signup. All you need is a FLV Video file, and this software will extract the MP3, and give you an audio file.
So you are able to listen to your favorite YouTube tracks on every MP3 player.
You can download it for free at [url=http://www.freeflvtomp3converter.com]www.freeflvtomp3converter.com[/url].
This may be useful to you.
You could easily be making money online in the underground world of [URL=http://www.www.blackhatmoneymaker.com]blackhat[/URL], Don’t feel silly if you don't know what blackhat is. Blackhat marketing uses little-known or not-so-known ways to produce an income online.
Post a Comment
<< Home